Page 1 of 1
216, WA after changing the judge
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:23 pm
by yagtctw
I have re-submitted the program. I find it is WA now.
Do another people also face this problem?
Re: 216, WA after changing the judge
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:06 pm
by mpi
I'm also stuck with this problem. I have dozens of WA's and my algorithm is just a simple backtracking. Anyone have got AC in the last few months? The success rate for this problem is surprisingly low for such an easy task.
P.S.: I've tried float, double and long double
Re: 216, WA after changing the judge
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:21 pm
by Jan
You are correct. I submitted my previously accepted code, but getting WA now. So, something is wrong!!
Re: 216, WA after changing the judge
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:19 pm
by Robert Gerbicz
Yes, the input/output is corrupt. My highly optimized non backtracking program which was ran in 0.002 sec on the old judge now gets WA.
And on the top20 list nobody has gotten AC on the new judge.
Re: 216, WA after changing the judge
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 9:29 pm
by Carlos
Corrector program was not compiled properly. We've fixed it and we're rejudging every submission.