I have re-submitted the program. I find it is WA now.
Do another people also face this problem?
216, WA after changing the judge
Moderator: Board moderators
216, WA after changing the judge
I'm sorry for my poor english... 

Re: 216, WA after changing the judge
I'm also stuck with this problem. I have dozens of WA's and my algorithm is just a simple backtracking. Anyone have got AC in the last few months? The success rate for this problem is surprisingly low for such an easy task.
P.S.: I've tried float, double and long double
P.S.: I've tried float, double and long double

Re: 216, WA after changing the judge
You are correct. I submitted my previously accepted code, but getting WA now. So, something is wrong!!
Ami ekhono shopno dekhi...
HomePage
HomePage
-
- Experienced poster
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 10:12 pm
- Location: Hungary, Pest county, Halasztelek
- Contact:
Re: 216, WA after changing the judge
Yes, the input/output is corrupt. My highly optimized non backtracking program which was ran in 0.002 sec on the old judge now gets WA.
And on the top20 list nobody has gotten AC on the new judge.
And on the top20 list nobody has gotten AC on the new judge.
-
- System administrator
- Posts: 1286
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 2:00 am
- Location: Valladolid, Spain
- Contact:
Re: 216, WA after changing the judge
Corrector program was not compiled properly. We've fixed it and we're rejudging every submission.
DON'T PM ME --> For any doubt, suggestion or error reporting, please use the "Contact us" form in the web.