Page 1 of 1
PE verdicts missing?
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:17 pm
by Darko
Is there a PE verdict on the new judge? I don't think there is, I think it might explain a few WAs (but not why they are suddenly PE).
PE exists...
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:13 pm
by baodog
Yes, PE exists... I got many already...
However there are cases where I thought I should
get PE but got WA.. like extra blank lines... spaces,
etc. It feels inconsistent.
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 11:32 pm
by DenisP
Yeah, I noticed it too. One of the problems like that is 699. I had to resubmit a couple of times before I noticed that I just did not print a blank line in between. I was very confused by WA first, since the problem is quite trivial.
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 5:02 pm
by enjolras
Yeah, the PE algorithm needs some tuning.
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:55 pm
by jurajz
Now I noticed one PE vs. WA problem. In 10436, in first submission I assumed, that I should write blank line after each test case. This submit was clarified as WA. In second submission, I assumed, that I should write blank line between consecutive test cases (= after each test case except the last). This submit was AC. I don't understand, why. First submit should had be PE. Or not? Btw. In problem description of 10436 is nothing about blank lines between test cases (explicit), but it causes WA. It's not wrong?
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:43 pm
by sclo
I noticed that most PE regarding blank lines are incorrectly classified as WA.
pe and don't wa
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 7:15 pm
by adelar
The code take PE in problem 10414
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int
main(){
cout << "something" << endl;
}
this is strange. Why this happens?