OJ Board

Posted: **Tue Sep 10, 2002 8:19 pm**

Be sure it is! Thank you for the info, I'll check out and try to see what's happening.

Posted: **Wed Sep 11, 2002 6:04 am**

May be it's possible to do a quick-fix? Just interprete NaN as 29.990 sec not as 0.000?

Running timing problems - "nan" time for a respons