All about problems in Volume 1. If there is a thread about your problem, please use it. If not, create one with its number in the subject.
Moderator: Board moderators
-
..
- A great helper
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2001 2:00 am
- Location: Hong Kong
Post
by .. » Sat Oct 11, 2003 8:36 am
Hi all,
I don't understand how to the get the sample output (29 units),
this is how I count the program, what's wrong?
Code: Select all
PROGRAM SAMPLEINPUT;
1 2
VAR
3
TEMP : RECORD
4 5
FIRST, SECOND : REAL;
6 7 8
END;
9
BEGIN {Ignore this }
10 11
TEMP.FIRST := 5.0E - 2;
12 13 14 15 16
READLN ( TEMP.SECOND);
17 18 19
WRITELN ( 'THE ANSWER IS', TEMP.FIRST * TEMP.SECOND : 7 : 3)
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
END.
28
~~A. N. Onymous
Thanks!
My signature:
- Please make discussion about the algorithm BRFORE posting source code.
We can learn much more in discussion than reading source code.
- I HATE testing account.
- Don't send me source code for debug.
-
Farid Ahmadov
- Experienced poster
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 8:39 am
- Location: Baku, Azerbaijan
Post
by Farid Ahmadov » Sat Oct 11, 2003 11:50 am
Hi ..
I haven't solved this problem yet. But I think you are counting wrong.
Code: Select all
1 2
PROGRAM SAMPLEINPUT;
3
VAR
4 5
TEMP : RECORD
6 7 8
FIRST, SECOND : REAL;
9
END;
10
BEGIN {Ignore this }
11 12 13 14
TEMP.FIRST := 5.0E-2;
15 16 17 18
READLN ( TEMP.SECOND);
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
WRITELN ( 'THE ANSWER IS', TEMP.FIRST * TEMP.SECOND : 7 : 3 )
29
END.
~~A. N. Onymous
I think it must be correct. 5.0E-2 is a constant. If there is "E" after a real number then there will sign(+ or -) and some integer number right after it. There cannot be something like: 5.0 E - 2 it will always be 5.0E-2. Hope it will help.
_____________
NO sigNature
-
halyavin
- New poster
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 4:36 pm
Post
by halyavin » Fri Nov 07, 2003 1:34 pm
Don't forget about this test:
begin
writeln('~~~~~~');
{~~~~~~~~~~~~~}
end.
~~anonimus
-
junbin
- Experienced poster
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2003 10:41 am
Post
by junbin » Wed Dec 17, 2003 9:00 am
halyavin wrote:Don't forget about this test:
begin
writeln('~~~~~~');
{~~~~~~~~~~~~~}
end.
~~anonimus
Answer for this is 5 units right?
-
mt
- New poster
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 9:48 pm
Post
by mt » Wed Jun 01, 2005 9:58 pm
Hi, all.
I've got a lot of WA on this problem.
I suspect there is something tricky about it.
Does anyone give me a clue?
-
Margarita
- New poster
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 7:28 pm
- Location: Ukraine, Kharkiv
-
Contact:
Post
by Margarita » Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:07 am
Hi 2 all!
can anyone give me some big test, syntactically correct, to check my program? i have runtime error at 0.000 time... what a pity

thanks
-
snar
- New poster
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 12:14 pm
- Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Post
by snar » Thu May 18, 2006 8:03 pm
Hi,
I
Narek Saribekyan
-
Jan
- Guru
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:58 pm
- Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
-
Contact:
Post
by Jan » Fri Sep 21, 2007 5:25 pm
Try the set..
Input:
Code: Select all
program test;
VAR
ch : array [1..20] of Char;
BEGIN {Ignore 'like a string'}
(* Comments can be splitted over several lines
and all the operators like + - * / should be ignored
*) Temp := 2;
iden := $abFe90;
_iden_ := 1e-90;
END.
~~Jan
Output:
Hope it helps.
-
deadangelx
- New poster
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 1:31 pm
Post
by deadangelx » Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:10 pm
I give a super critical input and output, some codes are from Jan, thanks.
input
Code: Select all
program test;
VAR
ch:array['a' .. 'z']of Char;
BEGIN{Ignore 'like a
string'}
(* Comments can be splitted over several lines
and all the operators like + - * / should be ignored
*)Temp:=2;
WRITELN ('''', TEMP.FIRST <= TEMP.SECOND : 7 : 3)
WRITELN ('''a is b''s', TEMP.FIRST <> TEMP.SECOND : 7 : 3)
iden:=($abFe90+1e-90)*2;
END.
~~bleed1979
output
Code: Select all
Program by bleed1979 contains 43 units.
Hope it helps.
-
brianfry713
- Guru
- Posts: 5947
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:09 am
- Location: San Jose, CA, USA
Post
by brianfry713 » Wed Oct 22, 2014 9:14 pm
From the problem statement:
The only comment delimiters that you should recognise are {}, and not (**).
So you don't need to handle the I/O posted by Jan and deadangelx to get AC. The judge's input does not contain (*
Check input and AC output for thousands of problems on
uDebug!
-
anacharsis
- Learning poster
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2015 1:56 am
Post
by anacharsis » Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:53 pm
So, this is actually Algol, but it's close enough to Pascal that you can use your Pascal unit counter/lexer on it.
It helped me get AC
Input:
Code: Select all
begin
comment Algol program print the primes less than 1000 using the
sieve method.;
Boolean array sieve[2:1000];
integer p, count;
comment Eliminate the multiples of the argument prime number;
procedure eliminate(p);
integer p;
begin
integer i;
for i := 2*p step p until 1000 do
sieve[i] := false
end;
comment Clear the sieve.;
integer i;
for i := 2 step 1 until 1000 do
sieve[i] := true;
comment Find the primes in range.;
for i := 2 step 1 until 1000 do
if sieve[i] then
eliminate(i);
comment Print the results, 10 per line.;
p := 2;
for count := 0 while p <= 1000 do begin
comment This construct is similar to a do .. while built with a goto.;
makeline:
if sieve[p] then begin
outinteger(1,p);
outstring(1,' ');
count := count + 1
end;
p := p + 1;
if p <= 1000 & count < 10 then goto makeline;
outstring(1,'\n')
end
end
~~Algol
Output
Program by Algol contains 176 units.
-
Dominik Michniewski
- Guru
- Posts: 834
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 4:11 pm
- Location: Wroclaw, Poland
-
Contact:
Post
by Dominik Michniewski » Mon Feb 06, 2017 12:14 am
Could anyone help me with any tricky input ?
I have got Wrong Answer with 0.000 time and I have passed all cases posted in this thread ...
If you really want to get Accepted, try to think about possible, and after that - about impossible ... and you'll get, what you want ....
Born from ashes - restarting counter of problems (800+ solved problems)
-
Dominik Michniewski
- Guru
- Posts: 834
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 4:11 pm
- Location: Wroclaw, Poland
-
Contact:
Post
by Dominik Michniewski » Mon Feb 06, 2017 10:22 pm
Never mind, I found my silly mistake in parsing identifiers

If you really want to get Accepted, try to think about possible, and after that - about impossible ... and you'll get, what you want ....
Born from ashes - restarting counter of problems (800+ solved problems)