People are driving Manzoor Mad

Post about everything you want - even if it is not related to programming or this site.

Moderator: Board moderators

Do u think Shariar Manzoor

Yes
13
25%
No
28
53%
A lot
12
23%
 
Total votes: 53

neno_uci
Experienced poster
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 12:26 pm
Location: Cuba

People are driving Manzoor Mad

Post by neno_uci »

Please tell if I am the only one that hates his problems...? :evil:

Shariar Manzoor -> Nothing personal, ok, just trying to change your point of view, I really think your problem statments are not the bests..., if you do not agree, please remeber the factorial of negative numbers, or just the new problem Maximum Sum (II), thanx in advance... :lol:
Adrian Kuegel
Guru
Posts: 724
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2001 2:00 am
Location: Germany

Post by Adrian Kuegel »

You should not judge Shahriar Manzoor on the few problems that were not so good. He wrote a lot of very nice problems.
neno_uci
Experienced poster
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 12:26 pm
Location: Cuba

Post by neno_uci »

Yes, and I know it, but I am only refering to those that were not so good..., :D
technobug
Learning poster
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2003 6:41 pm
Location: Brasilien
Contact:

Post by technobug »

And he is still a volunteer. if people keeps pissing him off telling him that his statements sucks he might simply say: "ok.... so just forget about it... i dont submit any problems anymore"... then what? we lose one who keeps us busy doing something on saturdays....
shahriar_manzoor
System administrator & Problemsetter
Posts: 399
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2002 2:00 am

I am impressed

Post by shahriar_manzoor »

Hello,
I am impressed getting so much attention in last few days. I remember all the bad problems that I made and simply I do not find enough time to fix them. Even as I write this thread I am thinking about two new problems so you just have to solve my bad problems to get a good rank :). It is always very difficult to set easy interesting problems. But it is very easy to make blunders while setting an easy problem.

The current description of maximum sum (II) is ok I think. Please point what u think is not ok. Then I can reply.
neno_uci
Experienced poster
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 12:26 pm
Location: Cuba

Post by neno_uci »

This is the line that made me lose my time during the contest:

A valid sub-sequence must have a single number in it.

Listen, I am not trying to judge you, I admire you and all Valladolid OJ members, I am just saying that you must be more careful writing problems...

Congratulations, and continue making us happy Shariar, I hope you understand what I am trying to say, ... :wink:
shahriar_manzoor
System administrator & Problemsetter
Posts: 399
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2002 2:00 am

kk

Post by shahriar_manzoor »

Yes the problem statement was wrong during contest. The red line you specified means

if input is "0 0 0 0 0 0" the output should be "0", not a blank line. Actually this is problem not a problem of algorithm just applying common sense. If this line was not there there would have been another confusion on what would be the output for "0 0 0 0 0".

cheers


-Shahriar
shahriar_manzoor
System administrator & Problemsetter
Posts: 399
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2002 2:00 am

kk

Post by shahriar_manzoor »

Yes the problem statement was wrong during contest. The red line you specified means

if input is "0 0 0 0 0 0" the output should be "0", not a blank line. Actually this is problem not a problem of algorithm just applying common sense. If this line was not there there would have been another confusion on what would be the output for "0 0 0 0 0".

Umm! Listen! The spelling of my name is "Shahriar"

cheers


-Sha(h)riar
neno_uci
Experienced poster
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 12:26 pm
Location: Cuba

Post by neno_uci »

I would be glad to see this:

A valid sub-sequence must have at least a single number in it.

instead.

Thanks for your reply Shahriar. :D
rotoZOOM
Learning poster
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 5:05 am
Location: Russia, Chelyabinsk
Contact:

Post by rotoZOOM »

neno_uci wrote:I would be glad to see this:

A valid sub-sequence must have at least a single number in it.

instead.

Thanks for your reply Shahriar. :D
Hei, hot bangladesh guys !
Enough.
All right.
Let's solve problems instead of bait each other. :)))
Andrey Mokhov
Experienced poster
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 7:45 am
Location: Kyrgyzstan

Post by Andrey Mokhov »

Hello, everyone.

I've been solving problems by Shahriar Manzoor for about three years. There were so many really brilliant ones (recent example - 10636 Stretching Geometry) that I can't imagine to feel anything but thanks to him.

They say Maximum Sum(II) statement is wrong... I solved it with my first submission and think that the statement says absolutely everything that is needed.

They say Contemplation! Algebra statement should say more... I haven't solved it yet - still TLE. I've read the post about it and was very upset that I couldn't guess myself about complex solution :oops: . The problem is really nice. And do you really want to solve only problems where you needn't use your brains a bit? So, to my mind Mr. Manzoor was right not to say anything about values of a and b.

The only inconvenience about Shahriar Manzoor's problems that I remember was 10402 Triangle Covering and it is not problem with statement but with judge solution. But he did lots of problems and only few 'blunders' - so I guess his bug-percent is 0 (rounded to nearest integer :lol: ).

Please don't stop it, Mr. Manzoor! We're waiting for your new tricky problems!

Best regards,
Andrey.
UFP2161
A great helper
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 7:49 pm
Contact:

Post by UFP2161 »

Maximum Sum(II) was wrong during the contest, as it had a statement that didn't really make sense:
In a given a sequence of non-negative integers you will have to find such a sequence in it whose summation is maximum. Note that I am asking for a sequence, not sub sequence.
which was not the intended problem (by strict definitions of sequence and sub-sequence).

The way it is now, there is no confusion as what one was intended to do.

[By my interpretation, the problem as stated before was just to output the input sequence on one line instead of N lines as anything other outputs would be a sub-sequence of the original.]
misof
A great helper
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 1:31 pm

yes and no

Post by misof »

Dear Mr. Manzoor,

I deeply enjoy the ideas behind most of the problems you post. From this point of view, you are a great problemsetter (one of my favourite ones :)). Keep up the good work!

However, there is also the other side of your problems - the problem statement. Being a problemsetter myself I understand, how hard it is to write a clear and bug-free problem statement. Not being a native english speaker, I know the amount of work required to write a clear problem statement in English. But I also know that bad English may cause many solvers to misunderstand the problem or not to understand anything at all. And troubles mentioned in previous posts seem to be often connected with your problem statements, not with the ideas. (As a wild guess, I think it is partially because there are so many of them...)

A few examples:

Recently I solved "10655 Contemplation - Algebra". I enjoyed the problem very much. However, I supposed incorrectly, that a and b have to be integers (as it is common practice if nothing else is said, especially in case of very brief problem statements). I had to check the forum to find out my mistake. Still, the problem was nice and not too easy after I noted the fact. E.g. I still had to consider complex a,b.

Point: Sometimes it isn't a bad idea to be a little more specific in the problem statement. In this case, a sentence like "Note that a and b don't have to be integers" would make the problem more clear, while not much easier to solve. Still, there is one another way to do this: If you want to omit such details and make them a catch in the problem, the best way to do this is to state the rest of the problem very, very formally. In that way the contestant knows the given limits precisely and he shouldn't assume anything more. With vague problem statements like in 10655 this is a problem.

I did also solve "10656 Maximum Sum II" and the experience was horrible. This was clearly supposed to be the easy task in the batch. Wasn't. Reason: Bad and ugly problem statement. Confusing and unclear. The current version is already better than the original ("and I mean sequence" and bits like that), but it still isn't clear ("must have a single number in it", the word "summation", more sequences of minimum length?).

Please try to make the problem statements as clear as possible. It won't make the problems any easier (or, in some cases, much easier), but it will make them more fun to solve and less frustrating. Also, try to use as simple English phrases as possible and include a well-described example if not sure whether the problem statement is sufficiently clear.

Hope you will read this :)

good luck
shamim
A great helper
Posts: 498
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2002 10:10 am
Location: Bozeman, Montana, USA

Post by shamim »

I totally agree with misof. His statements should be used as guidelines by all problemsetter.

A problem should not be made tricky, by not stating something that might affect implementation. For example, if a question involves finding the fibonnaci numbers, then the range should be mentioned, so the solvers know whether Big Integer should be used or not.
w k
Learning poster
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 11:14 pm

Post by w k »

Shahriar!
I'm with You!! I like tricky problems (even if I can't solve them - such problems I like the most!). Go on!!

Wojciech
Post Reply

Return to “Off topic (General chit-chat)”