Page 1 of 1

489 - Hangman Judge

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 5:52 am
by bleed1979
This article is about test cases of 489 - Hangman Judge.

Oct 8, 2009 UTC+8

Assume the answer is 'abc'.
At first time I guess 'd', and it should be wrong.
In the second guessing, I say 'd' again, and the right motion is to do nothing.

My first AC code didn't check it, and gave the second guessing as wrong guessing again.
I think this is a mistake that such code got AC.

Finally, I changed my code, and also got AC.
But I think this bug should be fixed.
Maybe test cases in this problem should be enhanced.
?

Re: 489 - Hangman Judge

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:25 pm
by Jan
If you think that the data sets are not good enough, you can always send some critical i/o to the admins.