216, WA after changing the judge

The forum to report every bug you find or tell us what you'd like to find in UVa OJ's new system

Moderator: Board moderators

Locked
yagtctw
New poster
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:18 pm

216, WA after changing the judge

Post by yagtctw »

I have re-submitted the program. I find it is WA now.
Do another people also face this problem?
I'm sorry for my poor english... :roll:

mpi
New poster
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:53 pm
Location: Madrid

Re: 216, WA after changing the judge

Post by mpi »

I'm also stuck with this problem. I have dozens of WA's and my algorithm is just a simple backtracking. Anyone have got AC in the last few months? The success rate for this problem is surprisingly low for such an easy task.

P.S.: I've tried float, double and long double :cry:

Jan
Guru
Posts: 1334
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:58 pm
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Contact:

Re: 216, WA after changing the judge

Post by Jan »

You are correct. I submitted my previously accepted code, but getting WA now. So, something is wrong!!
Ami ekhono shopno dekhi...
HomePage

Robert Gerbicz
Experienced poster
Posts: 196
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: Hungary, Pest county, Halasztelek
Contact:

Re: 216, WA after changing the judge

Post by Robert Gerbicz »

Yes, the input/output is corrupt. My highly optimized non backtracking program which was ran in 0.002 sec on the old judge now gets WA.
And on the top20 list nobody has gotten AC on the new judge.

Carlos
System administrator
Posts: 1286
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 2:00 am
Location: Valladolid, Spain
Contact:

Re: 216, WA after changing the judge

Post by Carlos »

Corrector program was not compiled properly. We've fixed it and we're rejudging every submission.
DON'T PM ME --> For any doubt, suggestion or error reporting, please use the "Contact us" form in the web.

Locked

Return to “Bugs and suggestions”