270 - Lining Up
Moderator: Board moderators
-
- New poster
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 6:46 pm
- Location: Campina Grande - Brazil
- Contact:
Problem 270 - Runtime Error (SIGSEGV)
Can anybody explain me why there are so many run time errors with that problem. (Including my ten ones) ?
I think that this problem is very easy, but I always get Runtime Error.
Since this is a multiple input problem, I supose that the input is as follow.
2 //Number of test cases
//blank line
1 1
2 2
3 3
9 10
10 11
//blank line
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
Is this correct ?
I think that this problem is very easy, but I always get Runtime Error.
Since this is a multiple input problem, I supose that the input is as follow.
2 //Number of test cases
//blank line
1 1
2 2
3 3
9 10
10 11
//blank line
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
Is this correct ?
-
- New poster
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 6:46 pm
- Location: Campina Grande - Brazil
- Contact:
seek help!
can you tell me why Runtime Error (SIGSEGV)?
Re: the problem is 270
the problem above is 270
SIGSEGV means
SIGnal of SEGment Violation
it often occurs when referring to invalid memory
eg. the subscript of the array exceeds the range what it should be within.
check your code carefully and think more over about where it is likely to happen.
good luck
SIGnal of SEGment Violation
it often occurs when referring to invalid memory
eg. the subscript of the array exceeds the range what it should be within.
check your code carefully and think more over about where it is likely to happen.
good luck
Time makes a fool of memory
And yet my memories still shine
And yet my memories still shine
to obayashi
i will do as you say.
Thanks..
Thanks..
270 Is O(n^2) possible?
I solved 270 by an algorithm of O(n^2 lgn).
But in the ranking, there are someone solved it in 1, 2 seconds.
Is there any O(n^2) algorithm for this question??
Thanks a lot!
But in the ranking, there are someone solved it in 1, 2 seconds.
Is there any O(n^2) algorithm for this question??
Thanks a lot!
My signature:
- Please make discussion about the algorithm BRFORE posting source code.
We can learn much more in discussion than reading source code. - I HATE testing account.
- Don't send me source code for debug.
270 RE
I keep on getting Runtime Error. How do I deal with this multiple input problem? Do I just write a program for one input, and the judge will run my program multiple times?? Or do I write a program to handle multiple inputs?? Please explain.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 834
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 4:11 pm
- Location: Wroclaw, Poland
- Contact:
If problem has blue mark, you must handle multiply input SELF.
In the past judge runs our programs many times if program have more than one input file - i.e. 111 problem. But now they discovered blu mark and we must handle such kind of data
In this problem you have to read number of tests and after that, read all tests to the end of file or number of tests. Test's data are separeted by empty lines.
Best regards
Dominik
In the past judge runs our programs many times if program have more than one input file - i.e. 111 problem. But now they discovered blu mark and we must handle such kind of data
In this problem you have to read number of tests and after that, read all tests to the end of file or number of tests. Test's data are separeted by empty lines.
Best regards
Dominik
-
- Guru
- Posts: 834
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 4:11 pm
- Location: Wroclaw, Poland
- Contact:
#270: 700 or more?
Problem description states
But after submitting a couple solutions I doubt about it... Is problem description correct?The input consists of N pairs of integers, where 1 < N < 700
Can either of you explain your algorithm or give more hints?
Here is my take:
1) Hash all coordinates by x and y values to arrive at 2 hash tables, one for x and one for y values.
2) Take the hash table (either x or y) with the least hashes.
3) Compare all coorindates in a hash with all coordinates OUTSIDE the hash (since every coordinate in a hash forms either a vertical or a horizontal line, so that is a trivial solution).
4) To see if three points a, b and c are collinear, (a is in the hash, b and c are outside the hash), simply compare the gradients of a-b and a-c.
My algorithm to compare the gradients is simply for all points outside a hash, calculate the gradient with a point inside the hash. If any two gradients are simliar, then the 3 points are collinear.
This, however, is a O(n^3) algorithm and even when I hash the gradients for each point, I get time limit exceeded.
Am I on the right track here, or am I hashing the wrong things altogether?
Here is my take:
1) Hash all coordinates by x and y values to arrive at 2 hash tables, one for x and one for y values.
2) Take the hash table (either x or y) with the least hashes.
3) Compare all coorindates in a hash with all coordinates OUTSIDE the hash (since every coordinate in a hash forms either a vertical or a horizontal line, so that is a trivial solution).
4) To see if three points a, b and c are collinear, (a is in the hash, b and c are outside the hash), simply compare the gradients of a-b and a-c.
My algorithm to compare the gradients is simply for all points outside a hash, calculate the gradient with a point inside the hash. If any two gradients are simliar, then the 3 points are collinear.
This, however, is a O(n^3) algorithm and even when I hash the gradients for each point, I get time limit exceeded.
Am I on the right track here, or am I hashing the wrong things altogether?