Hee, Just watching too much soccer...
Anyway, maybe I will notify the admin about this problem. I also notice that many people got WA, I dun know whether it is from this error or not...
Search found 5 matches
- Sun Jun 18, 2006 8:14 pm
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 103 - Stacking Boxes
- Replies: 200
- Views: 47077
- Fri Jun 16, 2006 5:41 pm
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 103 - Stacking Boxes
- Replies: 200
- Views: 47077
There should be 2 posibilities: 1 - OJ doesn't cover such a test case. 2 - Test multiple output includes wrong output. My question is that, how can a program produce a wrong result, can be accepted, because it is a simple case. Keep in mind that for this problem, even multiple output is allowed, the...
- Fri Jun 16, 2006 5:10 pm
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 103 - Stacking Boxes
- Replies: 200
- Views: 47077
First thing though, please specify the problem number in your post next time. I believe you are referring to problem 103, which has a yellow tick next to the problem. This means that for an input, it is possible to have more than one correct output as shamim stated in his post. Dear Ng Chun Yi, - I...
- Fri Jun 16, 2006 10:59 am
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 103 - Stacking Boxes
- Replies: 200
- Views: 47077
- Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:08 pm
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 103 - Stacking Boxes
- Replies: 200
- Views: 47077
103 Funny Judge Problem
Currently, my program got WA. For this input, my output is correct: Input: 5 2 41 595 291 836 350 602 483 548 537 624 My Output: 3 1 3 5 However, with an accepted code which I found in this forum, the output is wrong Output: 2 1 2 Here is the AC code(which produce wrong output for this input) 1. You...