Moha, my AC program output for your input
^ is end of line
############^
#XXXXXXXXXXXX#^
#X###########X# #^
#X# #X# #X#^
#X# ##### #X# #^
#X# #XXXXX# #X#^
#X# #X#### #X#^
#X# #X# #^
#X# #X#### #X#^
#X# #XXXXX# #X#^
#X# ##### #X# #^
#X# #X# #X#^
#X###########X# #^
#XXXXXXXXXXXX ...
Search found 11 matches
- Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:19 am
- Forum: Volume 7 (700-799)
- Topic: 782 - Contour Painting
- Replies: 53
- Views: 30774
- Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:12 pm
- Forum: Volume 2 (200-299)
- Topic: 216 - Getting in Line
- Replies: 57
- Views: 31056
still WA
Actually, I have the same output for the samples posted.
I don't think that.
For example this line is wrong:
return sqrt((a[X]-b[X])*(a[X]-b[X]) + (a[Y]-b[Y])*(a[Y]-b[Y])+16.0);
because the cabel is longer by 16 feets than the distance of the two points, so it should be:
return sqrt((a[X]-b ...
- Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:50 am
- Forum: Volume 2 (200-299)
- Topic: 216 - Getting in Line
- Replies: 57
- Views: 31056
Re: I used brute force for this problem, but always have get
Usually I don't paste my code in forums, but ...whatelse...I try to solved it using brute force. This is my code. Someone can find the error?
:-?
Try Sample I/O.
Did you code yourself?
Actually, I have the same output for the samples posted. I like to know if there are some tricky input or some ...
:-?
Try Sample I/O.
Did you code yourself?
Actually, I have the same output for the samples posted. I like to know if there are some tricky input or some ...
- Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:46 am
- Forum: Volume 2 (200-299)
- Topic: 216 - Getting in Line
- Replies: 57
- Views: 31056
I used brute force for this problem, but always have get WA
Usually I don't paste my code in forums, but ...whatelse...I try to solved it using brute force. This is my code. Someone can find the error?
//216.getting in line (brute force)
//determine how the computers should be connected into such a chain to minimize the total amount of cable needed
#include ...
//216.getting in line (brute force)
//determine how the computers should be connected into such a chain to minimize the total amount of cable needed
#include ...
- Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:22 am
- Forum: Volume 7 (700-799)
- Topic: 782 - Contour Painting
- Replies: 53
- Views: 30774
sample input/output for problem 782
If you don't return it to it's original form before printing, you'll get P.E. :wink:
My ACC solution gives no output for your input, just a blank grid with underscores.
Btw, I don't care about tab <'\t'>.
Good luck ! :lol:
I don't know if my output mantain de original form of the input :-?. I ...
My ACC solution gives no output for your input, just a blank grid with underscores.
Btw, I don't care about tab <'\t'>.
Good luck ! :lol:
I don't know if my output mantain de original form of the input :-?. I ...
- Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:09 am
- Forum: Volume 6 (600-699)
- Topic: 622 - Grammar Evaluation
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8245
clearing doubt for leading characters
It's unnecesary truncates any leading SPACEs and/or TABs.
for this input
26
32
-12
+12
0
12+34
1*(2+3)+3
1(2+3)+3
qwe323
1*(2+3)+399
1*(1*(1*(1*(1*(1*(1*(1+1)+1)+1)+1)+1)+1)+1)*(8+1)
1*(1+2+3)*(1+3)+(1+2)*8
((-1)*9)
((1)*9)
((0)*(9))
1* (1+ 2 + 3) * (1 + 3)+ (1 + 2)*8
2*1*1+1*1*1000*1*1000*1*1 ...
for this input
26
32
-12
+12
0
12+34
1*(2+3)+3
1(2+3)+3
qwe323
1*(2+3)+399
1*(1*(1*(1*(1*(1*(1*(1+1)+1)+1)+1)+1)+1)+1)*(8+1)
1*(1+2+3)*(1+3)+(1+2)*8
((-1)*9)
((1)*9)
((0)*(9))
1* (1+ 2 + 3) * (1 + 3)+ (1 + 2)*8
2*1*1+1*1*1000*1*1000*1*1 ...
- Sat Jun 30, 2007 3:58 am
- Forum: Volume 3 (300-399)
- Topic: 355 - The Bases Are Loaded
- Replies: 74
- Views: 30573
leading zeros doesn't matter
I have tried this input as follows:
2 2 0001
you should omit the leading zeros and as well as your repetance your output.
I think it is not a valid case. Because my code returns
0001 base 2 = 1 base 2
So, you don't have to think about leading zeroes.
I'm agree with you, both outputs are ...
2 2 0001
you should omit the leading zeros and as well as your repetance your output.
I think it is not a valid case. Because my code returns
0001 base 2 = 1 base 2
So, you don't have to think about leading zeroes.
I'm agree with you, both outputs are ...
- Tue Aug 29, 2006 7:07 am
- Forum: Volume 104 (10400-10499)
- Topic: 10406 - Cutting tabletops
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6979
10406 seems 877(offset polygon)?
I don't understand, the problem seems similar to offset polygon.
I'm only add this line:
offset*= -1;
the logic is the same or have any special case?
I'm only add this line:
offset*= -1;
the logic is the same or have any special case?
- Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:03 am
- Forum: Volume 104 (10400-10499)
- Topic: 10406 - Cutting tabletops
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6979
10406 have any trick?
hi Willar, I have some doubts for this problem.
What happen if the width d (to be cut off) is greater than the smallest distance between the center and an edge of the polygon?
the area should be negative or i would be print "0.000"?
what is the output for this input:
2 4 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 0
1 3 0 ...
What happen if the width d (to be cut off) is greater than the smallest distance between the center and an edge of the polygon?
the area should be negative or i would be print "0.000"?
what is the output for this input:
2 4 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 0
1 3 0 ...
- Fri Aug 25, 2006 7:26 pm
- Forum: Volume 8 (800-899)
- Topic: 877 - Offset Polygons
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4155
I GOT AC, thanks little joey
WA code:
printf ("%.3f %.3lf\n",p_inter.x,p_inter.y);
AC code:
printf ("%.3f %.3lf\n",p_inter.x+1e-8,p_inter.y+1e-8);

printf ("%.3f %.3lf\n",p_inter.x,p_inter.y);
AC code:
printf ("%.3f %.3lf\n",p_inter.x+1e-8,p_inter.y+1e-8);

- Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:41 pm
- Forum: Volume 8 (800-899)
- Topic: 877 - Offset Polygons
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4155
877 Precision Error???
hi little joey, I proposed a similar solution as yours, but I can't got AC. Can you post I/O samples? Because I think that i have an precision error.
I can't understand how you can print "-0.000"????
(sorry about my "rusty" english)
I can't understand how you can print "-0.000"????
(sorry about my "rusty" english)