Search found 26 matches
- Thu Nov 28, 2002 3:10 pm
- Forum: Volume 3 (300-399)
- Topic: 378 - Intersecting Lines
- Replies: 48
- Views: 24062
- Tue Nov 19, 2002 9:47 am
- Forum: Other words
- Topic: Mr. Mahbub, would u plz help me !!!
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1805
- Mon Nov 18, 2002 2:05 pm
- Forum: Volume 3 (300-399)
- Topic: 371 - Ackermann Functions
- Replies: 196
- Views: 51118
- Sun Nov 10, 2002 3:07 pm
- Forum: Volume 104 (10400-10499)
- Topic: 10402 - Triangle Covering
- Replies: 37
- Views: 11494
ATTN : PROBLEMSETTER 10402 (TRIANGLE COVERING)
There is no doubt that t4 = s*4/sqrt(3)...Becoz it is written by the
dicoverer of the problem!
The result for t2 is s* (4*root(6) - 6*root(2)) which is also as stated by
David Candrell...
So the prob is for t3 and t6..where he stated that t3 = 2.108+ and t6 =
3.168+..which do not hav analytic ...
dicoverer of the problem!
The result for t2 is s* (4*root(6) - 6*root(2)) which is also as stated by
David Candrell...
So the prob is for t3 and t6..where he stated that t3 = 2.108+ and t6 =
3.168+..which do not hav analytic ...
- Sun Nov 10, 2002 3:04 pm
- Forum: Volume 104 (10400-10499)
- Topic: 10402 - Triangle Covering
- Replies: 37
- Views: 11494
ATTN : PROBLEMSETTER
There is no doubt that t4 = s*4/sqrt(3)...Becoz it is written by the
dicoverer of the problem!
The result for t2 is s* (4*root(6) - 6*root(2)) which is also as stated by
David Candrell...
So the prob is for t3 and t6..where he stated that t3 = 2.108+ and t6 =
3.168+..which do not hav analytic ...
dicoverer of the problem!
The result for t2 is s* (4*root(6) - 6*root(2)) which is also as stated by
David Candrell...
So the prob is for t3 and t6..where he stated that t3 = 2.108+ and t6 =
3.168+..which do not hav analytic ...
- Sun Nov 10, 2002 8:06 am
- Forum: Volume 100 (10000-10099)
- Topic: 10003 - Cutting Sticks
- Replies: 59
- Views: 37296
- Thu Nov 07, 2002 6:16 am
- Forum: Volume 100 (10000-10099)
- Topic: 10008 - What's Cryptanalysis?
- Replies: 55
- Views: 27221
- Thu Nov 07, 2002 6:13 am
- Forum: Volume 100 (10000-10099)
- Topic: 10020 - Minimal coverage
- Replies: 57
- Views: 27298
10020 - Minimal coverage
Wats the idea?
I got WA in greedy approach :
Always taking the line with highest end_x which has a lower left_index than curent covered length..
Thanks
Light
I got WA in greedy approach :
Always taking the line with highest end_x which has a lower left_index than curent covered length..
Thanks
Light
- Thu Nov 07, 2002 5:30 am
- Forum: Volume 103 (10300-10399)
- Topic: 10374 - Election
- Replies: 44
- Views: 22930
- Wed Nov 06, 2002 9:10 am
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 100 - The 3n + 1 problem
- Replies: 1394
- Views: 317862
- Wed Nov 06, 2002 8:56 am
- Forum: Volume 103 (10300-10399)
- Topic: 10306 - e-Coins
- Replies: 9
- Views: 8143
- Wed Nov 06, 2002 5:59 am
- Forum: Volume 3 (300-399)
- Topic: 371 - Ackermann Functions
- Replies: 196
- Views: 51118
- Wed Nov 06, 2002 5:40 am
- Forum: Volume 103 (10300-10399)
- Topic: 10386 - Circles in Triangle
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3408
- Tue Nov 05, 2002 3:19 pm
- Forum: Volume 3 (300-399)
- Topic: 376 - More Triangles ... THE AMBIGUOUS CASE
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6525
Output Format!!!!:((((((((
Can any one tell me exactly wats the ouput format??
I mean how many gaps between the words ?
Or wats the value for a, b in print (%a.blf)...
I think it will be easier if someone can give me printing part of his/her code..
Thanks
Light.
I mean how many gaps between the words ?
Or wats the value for a, b in print (%a.blf)...
I think it will be easier if someone can give me printing part of his/her code..

Thanks
Light.
- Tue Nov 05, 2002 2:17 pm
- Forum: Volume 103 (10300-10399)
- Topic: 10398 - The Golden Pentagon
- Replies: 17
- Views: 5776