OJ Board

Which compiler are you using? I've copypasted your code in a file and ran g++ code.cpp -lm -lcrypt -O2 -pipe -DONLINE_JUDGE (UVA Judge's compiling options) in a Linux shell using the GNU C++ Compiler v4.4.5, and just got a couple of warnings regarding scanf() :

code.cpp: In function ‘int main ...

I'm pretty sure that the OJ input for this problem isn't as exhaustive as it should be.


Yesterday I tried to solve problem nº 14 from projecteuler.net (which asks for the positive number below 1 milion which generates the longest Collatz sequence) with my AC code of problem 100 from UVa.

So I ...

oh hai,

I've already solved the problem (scoring a pitiful run time btw) but I'm always not really sure of what to do when it comes to handle input like the one seen in this problem.


This is some kind of sketch written in C++ showing my approach:


string word;
vector<string> dic;
char symbol ...

You can't. If you want to see your own code just keep your source files.

I'm also getting WA despite of passing the sample input and everything I could think of (including n = 1)
My code (C++):


Removed after AC


Edit: Ok I finally found myself a set of test cases that didn't generate a correct answer ("3 0 0 6", "4 0 0 0 10", etc. printed "Jolly") and solved the ...

Today some of my solved problem runtimes have changed (to worst) without submitting any new code.
Here's a pic: http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/6356/pantallazox.png
The most clear example: Problem nº 100 can be only solved in less than 3 sec, and now it says that it ran in 4.977s (before it was 0 ...

Today some of my solved problem runtimes have changed (to worst) without submitting any new code.
Here's a pic: http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/6356/pantallazox.png
The most clear example: Problem nº 100 can be only solved in less than 3 sec, and now it says that it ran in 4.977s (before it was 0 ...