Take a look here:
http://fdemesmay.dyndns.org/cs/acm/v1/114.html
Search found 13 matches
- Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:13 pm
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 114 - Simulation Wizardry
- Replies: 80
- Views: 16320
- Wed Sep 07, 2005 1:01 pm
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 146 - ID Codes
- Replies: 35
- Views: 10074
- Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:24 am
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 100 - The 3n + 1 problem
- Replies: 1394
- Views: 318350
- Tue Sep 06, 2005 5:52 am
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 100 - The 3n + 1 problem
- Replies: 1394
- Views: 318350
- Mon Sep 05, 2005 4:32 am
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 146 - ID Codes
- Replies: 35
- Views: 10074
- Mon Sep 05, 2005 4:25 am
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 123 - Searching Quickly
- Replies: 55
- Views: 12648
- Mon Sep 05, 2005 4:22 am
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 100 - The 3n + 1 problem
- Replies: 1394
- Views: 318350
- Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:40 pm
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 129 - Krypton Factor
- Replies: 25
- Views: 5486
- Wed Aug 03, 2005 5:51 pm
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 139 - Telephone Tangles
- Replies: 66
- Views: 15774
139-PE-Can anybody with ACC code give me 1 output?
because I've tried a lot of things and its still PE. I hate those response graphs instead of real responses!
- Wed Jun 15, 2005 5:03 pm
- Forum: Volume 8 (800-899)
- Topic: 820 - Internet Bandwidth
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27960
For your entry, my solution is 30, and that's also the solution computed with my hands, so it should be correct.
I don't understand your problem, because it really IS simple and I won't give you the solution either because you would commit suicide for not having thought that yourself. So let's try ...
I don't understand your problem, because it really IS simple and I won't give you the solution either because you would commit suicide for not having thought that yourself. So let's try ...
- Wed Jun 15, 2005 10:26 am
- Forum: Volume 8 (800-899)
- Topic: 820 - Internet Bandwidth
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27960
By the way I don'tunderstand that that:
does work. I would have writen that instead:
Does your code REALLY work or is it only luck if it's going through the judge tests?
Code: Select all
f[u][v]+=max;
f[v][u]=-f[u][v];
Code: Select all
f[u][v]+=max;
f[v][u]-=max;
- Wed Jun 15, 2005 9:57 am
- Forum: Volume 8 (800-899)
- Topic: 820 - Internet Bandwidth
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27960
- Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:36 pm
- Forum: Volume 8 (800-899)
- Topic: 820 - Internet Bandwidth
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27960
hum hum
there is a small special point : reread the text
I've changed it in your code and I got Accepted P.E.
I've changed it in your code and I got Accepted P.E.