UVa OJ Board

I failed to migrate submissions from the old UVA account 19422 to my current account mido1236 on the new uva site. Now the site reports that I already migrated my submissions. Any help would be welcome.

It seems I messed up with the submission migration (migrated a different account, it seems). Of course now when I retry it the system reports that I have already migrated.My ID is 19422. Thank you for your time.

I had a dream the other day that the 2 world finals limit ICPC rule was changed to an extra year for those that got honorable mention twice....

Just a dream...nothing more...

honest....

Don't think so....

For any greedy algm you think of, you'd probably be able to find a counter case...

Good luck...

by "try to remove one edge from graph" I presume one of the edges in the first MST, am I right? In that case, that should work(as far as I can remember... )..

Much obliged...thanks...

Btw, is this officially stated somewhere, or was it just word of mouth...?

3 years on this great judge and I still don't know the following....

What version of gcc is used...?
Is the compiled code optimized or not...?

Thanks mates....

Any ideas for problem A in finals warmup 2(Cabbages)....thanks

tough indeed...

would normal,direct min-max with memoization work here, or must I use shortcuts...?

thanks...

Any hints how to do this.... I tried to think of possible greedy algs, but each one seemed to have a snag...

Thanks....

Try this:

http://w3.msi.vxu.se/~wlo/files/STPHT05/Slides6.pdf

I still don't get how 14 is the answer for k=2 and n=100. From what I understood, we would throw a balloon at level 50. Assuming that it bursts, then we would need 49 trials to test the range from 1 till 49.

Ditto....

I think you meant I==1 instead of N==1....

Just got my code from WA for several days to AC. The last changes I made were as follows: Fix the code for checking that the two points are not the same. Fix the code for checking the intersection between the intersection between the rope and the circle Use double instead of long double It's worthy ...