OJ Board

Yes, my wrong code gets away with this !!
But fails, when the larger piece is "really" large .. maybe becos of my logic to solve the problem.

Hi ,

I think the judge's input cases are not dealing with some situations where the area of the larger cake is greater than half the cake size.

I wrote a wrong solution initially and got it AC. Later , realised that my previous solution was wrong.

For example

10 1
0 9 10 9
0 9 10 0

For the ...

Are u sure ??
Because , my AC code gives o/p for the following test case : as which is wrong ... Thats y i asked ...
Please verify . The only way i cud have got away with that is when there is no such test case !!

And ... can u pls post the judge solutions for the above test cases if u dont mind ?

No , i dont thk u have !

I didnt handle such cases in contest time , and managed to get AC !!

Do u understand the kind of test cases i m trying to say??

10 1
0 9 10 9
0 9 10 0

The correct output must be :

277.68 2.40

But it seems as if there is no such test case in the judge's test cases.
ie , The area of the largest piece is never greater than half the area of the cake in any of judge's input. I thk these cases can also be included.
Please ...