Search found 7 matches
- Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:08 am
- Forum: Volume 113 (11300-11399)
- Topic: 11319 - Stupid Sequence
- Replies: 19
- Views: 9719
- Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:04 pm
- Forum: Volume 113 (11300-11399)
- Topic: 11319 - Stupid Sequence
- Replies: 19
- Views: 9719
- Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:04 pm
- Forum: Volume 113 (11300-11399)
- Topic: 11319 - Stupid Sequence
- Replies: 19
- Views: 9719
- Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:30 pm
- Forum: Volume 113 (11300-11399)
- Topic: 11319 - Stupid Sequence
- Replies: 19
- Views: 9719
Thank you for all your good suggestions. I think I solved the problem..but the judge does not agree, and I am getting frustrated to no end. I generated my own input files with Python, tested the biggest coefficients for which f(1500) fits in 64 bits (a0 = 1000, a1=1000, a2=1000, a3=1000, a4=1000, a5 ...
- Sun Oct 21, 2007 10:21 am
- Forum: Volume 113 (11300-11399)
- Topic: 11319 - Stupid Sequence
- Replies: 19
- Views: 9719
- Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:05 am
- Forum: Volume 113 (11300-11399)
- Topic: 11319 - Stupid Sequence
- Replies: 19
- Views: 9719
11319 - Stupid Sequence
I solved the problem using consecutive differences and detecting when the difference becomes constant. The method works correctly for small enough inputs, including the examples given and some sequences I generated. However, with larger numbers the differences are no longer computed correctly, and ...
- Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:29 am
- Forum: Volume 113 (11300-11399)
- Topic: 11321 - Sort! Sort!! and Sort!!!
- Replies: 50
- Views: 29826