OJ Board

turcse143,
I found your approach is somehow wrong. Consider the following samples -

Sample Input:

5
1 2 -1 3 5
18
1 2 3 4 5 -1 2 2 3 4 5 7 4 2 1 0 -3


You are keeping two information - maxn[] the maximum negative values and maxp[]: the maximum positive values, right?

But you reinitialized ...

Turcse,
check your maxp[] indexing. I found your code assigns uninitialized maxp[] values to c in the following code fragment -

if(c<maxp[i])
c=maxp[i];

--here verify that all your maxp 's are valid or initialized earlier.

Also check the following I/O:
Sample Input:

3
0 -2 3
2
0 -2 ...

Forget that, I've solved the bug.
I guess there are cases like the following -

Input:
(*a++(*)
(*a{+}*)
<************)>
()(***)(**)
()(***)(*)
({{}{}}[{(){}[]}
([))
()(**)
()*
aaaaaaa
aaa(aaaa
*******
a*a*a*a
()a
a()
()*()
(*a{+}*)
**)
*(*
(*a++(*)



Output:
NO 6
YES
NO 13
YES ...

Can anyone tell me what is wrong with my code? or provide some critical I/O....

After solving any problems, I always check my rank in the Problem stats page. In previous system I found my rank down few pages, but now in the new system I was stuck to see few of my ranks at top 10...or above.

I was thinking and praising myself for that, but after a while I found that ranking ...

Thanks Jan,
Your point is right. Taking input using gets() is wrong in the following inputs...(Leading spaces in a line jeopardized my procedures). Good observation!!


Sample Input:
0000005
1250000
1
00000000000000
12
50
0
100001
5
80100



Sample Output:
6250000
0
600
0
400500

What is the problem with my code - it's getting WA.
I've read all the posts, that's why I've ommited any leading zeros...increased the size of the arrays...Please check it.
I've also checked with all the I/O in posted corresponding threads...

Thanks Jan,
It's now accepted.

Jan,
I'm getting WA in the following code. can you find bugs in my code? Can you give some test cases too. Thanks.

My previous post was a mistake cause i copied Miras's input with mouse and pasted, so a trailing space character can be seen in my output. Now i've corrected the input, now my output is -

The string 'aAa' contains 3 palindromes.
The string ' AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAmirasAAAAAAAAAAAAAA' contains 28 ...

Miras's input:

aAa
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAmirasAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
A A


My output: (yet getting WA):(

The string 'aAa ' contains 4 palindromes.
The string ' AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAmirasAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ' contains 28 palindromes.
The string 'A A' contains 5 palindromes.



Is there anybody verify ...

Miras, is your second case's output OK? your output is 4. But aren't there 5 palindromes? Though i'm getting WA
Can you please send me more test cases..??

Ashis, CSEDU