OJ Board

It was the previous judge solution Anyway, thanks for the modification or correction. I am too old to solve it again.

Looks like somebody has killed my solution

I have solved the problem with famous Ukkonen's (I hope the name is correct ) algorithm which is also known as suffix tree method. The original data was not very strong to differentiate between KMP and mine Also it had some leaks( )....Now they are fixed.....
--sajjad

I confess that the description was not well furnished I will fix it ASAP and try to avoid such situations in my next available chance

shouldn't there be a special judge ?

i am also tired of this...............it seems that i have to remember every solution and logic behind them throughout my life
recently the rejudgement of 147 vexed me too much
it wasn't very urgent i think...........
especially changing the problem statement is very disturbing

why not a section for archive problems ?

Well, a lot of discussions are going on about this problem. Many of you are suspicious about the correctness of the dataset. Me and Kamruzzaman, both of us have written the judge's solution for this problem. And our output didn't mismatch. Surely this is not enough to prove our correctness. But the ...

Is there anyone who has worked with java telephony or jtapi. Please help me if possible. If you can help me, please mail me at
sprinter@aitlbd.net