The results for the second profile are surprising: if a word is duplicated in the profile, the judge expects us to consider two occurances of that word within the window to be a hit.
I think the problem was unfortunately underspecified in this regard. It hinges on the interpretation of the phrase ...
The problem says: "if either (or both) cannot move both will halt", so if Paskill is stuck (cannot move), wouldn't Lisper halt? (and thus cannot be destroyed or annihilated).
I think the wording of the problem does not match the data.... I don't think so. The question said:
Well, if you think about it, in this case *today* did have the same number of 'stars' and certainly relative importance, and the problem does say to order by input if there are problems.
*today* is simply the notation and is not related to the relative importance. It is not logical to list a ...
After the new statistics is effective, I cannot get 0.000 time even I sent just the answer to the judge. The best I can get is 0.002. Just wondering what's happening...
anala_sridhar, I can send you the input/output if you provide a email address. Single letter words are relative anangrams but the input used by the judge seems not to have such cases. My AC program does not print out anything from your input.
I have the same understanding at the very beginning. I added that input case because someone in the forum said you had to consider this in order to get AC. The locality name should not contain spaces as well (as I can tell after finding the possible input the judge used) but someone also suggested ...
little joey, would you please specify which ones are ambiguous? I believe the input the judge used does not have STD calls with area code 0. So, your AC program outputs differently with mine.