No such problem here, but I haven't submitted code in several years. :-) In any case, you'd have to consider arbitrary parenthesis setting, so (hint:) infix notation might not be the best possible data representation.
/* Steinar */
Search found 5 matches
- Tue Aug 23, 2005 8:15 pm
- Forum: Volume 5 (500-599)
- Topic: 549 - Evaluating an Equations Board
- Replies: 13
- Views: 6539
- Tue Aug 23, 2005 8:03 pm
- Forum: Volume 5 (500-599)
- Topic: 549 - Evaluating an Equations Board
- Replies: 13
- Views: 6539
- Tue Aug 23, 2005 7:54 pm
- Forum: Volume 5 (500-599)
- Topic: 549 - Evaluating an Equations Board
- Replies: 13
- Views: 6539
- Tue Nov 26, 2002 4:49 am
- Forum: Volume 5 (500-599)
- Topic: 549 - Evaluating an Equations Board
- Replies: 13
- Views: 6539
Error, please disregard
It was my fault after all -- I rewrote the parser once again and fixed a minor bug, and now it got accepted :-)
- Tue Nov 26, 2002 2:09 am
- Forum: Volume 5 (500-599)
- Topic: 549 - Evaluating an Equations Board
- Replies: 13
- Views: 6539
549 - Evaluating an Equations Board
I tried to submit 549 with a lot of different algorithms and parser twists, but I always ended up getting WA... Finally, I added some basic sanity checks to the input parser... They failed. I've tried making a _very_ flexible parser, but still no luck... My algorithm is more than fast enough (~0.2se...