I got a lot of WAs on this problem because my program would fail on cases that product of all selected numbers became zero and I hadn't noticed that by excluding negative numbers we would reach a better sum.
This testcase my help other people making the same mistake:
Input:
6 4 5 -2 -1 0 0 0
4 4 ...
Search found 20 matches
- Sat Aug 03, 2013 12:27 pm
- Forum: Volume 107 (10700-10799)
- Topic: 10747 - Maximum Subsequence
- Replies: 15
- Views: 12289
- Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:09 am
- Forum: Volume 116 (11600-11699)
- Topic: 11689 - Soda Surpler
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8277
Re: 11689 Soda Surpler wrong answer
Input:
25
999 998 44
999 998 7
999 998 14
999 998 9
999 998 6
999 998 3
999 998 113
999 998 13
999 998 17
999 998 123
9 0 3
5 5 2
999 998 222
50 50 6
855 22 32
665 21 4
800 200 14
147 651 21
333 265 8
222 144 28
255 666 34
889 554 1001
362 879 214
999 999 1225
214 689 140
AC Output:
46
332 ...
25
999 998 44
999 998 7
999 998 14
999 998 9
999 998 6
999 998 3
999 998 113
999 998 13
999 998 17
999 998 123
9 0 3
5 5 2
999 998 222
50 50 6
855 22 32
665 21 4
800 200 14
147 651 21
333 265 8
222 144 28
255 666 34
889 554 1001
362 879 214
999 999 1225
214 689 140
AC Output:
46
332 ...
- Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:26 pm
- Forum: Volume 12 (1200-1299)
- Topic: 1235 - Anti Brute Force Lock
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3205
Re: UVA 1235
Input
50
71 8467 6334 6500 9169 5724 1478 9358 6962 4464 5705 8145 3281 6827 9961 0491 2995 1942 4827 5436 2391 4604 3902 0153 0292 2382 7421 8716 9718 9895 5447 1726 4771 1538 1869 9912 5667 6299 7035 9894 8703 3811 1322 0333 7673 4664 5141 7711 8253 6868 5547 7644 2662 2757 0037 2859 8723 9741 ...
50
71 8467 6334 6500 9169 5724 1478 9358 6962 4464 5705 8145 3281 6827 9961 0491 2995 1942 4827 5436 2391 4604 3902 0153 0292 2382 7421 8716 9718 9895 5447 1726 4771 1538 1869 9912 5667 6299 7035 9894 8703 3811 1322 0333 7673 4664 5141 7711 8253 6868 5547 7644 2662 2757 0037 2859 8723 9741 ...
- Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:57 am
- Forum: Volume 120 (12000-12099)
- Topic: 12050 - Palindrome Numbers
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1083
12050 - Palindrome Numbers
Input:
1
5
12
13
14
15
16
24
48
50
60
70
80
90
100
108
110
120
135
140
152
160
180
185
192
201
210
235
255
280
300
312
400
412
452
483
501
505
550
600
610
2100
2513
5223
7521
9653
12200
15366
25000
36200
36877
39566
75366
96544
123311
225566
422553
755663
966999
1225566
3665533
5258844
6333333 ...
1
5
12
13
14
15
16
24
48
50
60
70
80
90
100
108
110
120
135
140
152
160
180
185
192
201
210
235
255
280
300
312
400
412
452
483
501
505
550
600
610
2100
2513
5223
7521
9653
12200
15366
25000
36200
36877
39566
75366
96544
123311
225566
422553
755663
966999
1225566
3665533
5258844
6333333 ...
- Thu Mar 21, 2013 4:16 pm
- Forum: Volume 109 (10900-10999)
- Topic: 10926 - How Many Dependencies?
- Replies: 33
- Views: 20112
Re: 10926 - How Many Dependencies?
I guess data set of this program isn't complete enough!!!;-)
I used a simple topological sort algorithm and although it wasn't giving the correct answer for some test cases I made it got AC :wink:
For example the correct answer for the following input should be 6 as it's produced by my other ...
I used a simple topological sort algorithm and although it wasn't giving the correct answer for some test cases I made it got AC :wink:
For example the correct answer for the following input should be 6 as it's produced by my other ...
- Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:19 am
- Forum: Volume 7 (700-799)
- Topic: 711 - Dividing up
- Replies: 25
- Views: 14613
Re: 711 - Dividing up
Thanks brianfry, I need to work on it.
- Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:48 am
- Forum: Volume 7 (700-799)
- Topic: 711 - Dividing up
- Replies: 25
- Views: 14613
Re: 711 - Dividing up
Thanks brianfry, I changed my code and now it produces the correct output but no luck in getting AC.
Here's my code with your input: http://ideone.com/xfOr9v
Thanks.
Here's my code with your input: http://ideone.com/xfOr9v
Thanks.
- Tue Mar 12, 2013 10:40 am
- Forum: Volume 103 (10300-10399)
- Topic: 10330 - Power Transmission
- Replies: 43
- Views: 21601
Re: 10330 - Power Transmission
@lbv
Thanks a million for your reply.
Now I understand why it doesn't work.
Thanks.
Thanks a million for your reply.
Now I understand why it doesn't work.
Thanks.
- Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:20 am
- Forum: Volume 7 (700-799)
- Topic: 711 - Dividing up
- Replies: 25
- Views: 14613
Re: 711 - Dividing up
Can anyone tell me what is wrong with my code please?
Thanks in advance.
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstring>
#include <algorithm>
#include <climits>
using namespace std;
const int marbValues[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 100, 200, 1000};
const int MC = 10;
void changeMarbleCount(int marblesCount ...
Thanks in advance.
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstring>
#include <algorithm>
#include <climits>
using namespace std;
const int marbValues[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 100, 200, 1000};
const int MC = 10;
void changeMarbleCount(int marblesCount ...
- Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:19 pm
- Forum: Volume 107 (10700-10799)
- Topic: 10718 - Bit Mask
- Replies: 29
- Views: 14491
Re: 10718 - Bit Mask
I used this algorithm for this question:
I start with a mask equal to 0. I find the MSB in U then try to set corresponding bit in the mask 1 in the condition that 1) the result is less than U
and 2) if this bit is 0 in N or it's 1 but if we don't set this bit, with the remaining bits we can't ...
I start with a mask equal to 0. I find the MSB in U then try to set corresponding bit in the mask 1 in the condition that 1) the result is less than U
and 2) if this bit is 0 in N or it's 1 but if we don't set this bit, with the remaining bits we can't ...
- Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:02 pm
- Forum: Volume 103 (10300-10399)
- Topic: 10330 - Power Transmission
- Replies: 43
- Views: 21601
Re: 10330 - Power Transmission
Thanks lbv.
I'd constructed the graph in a wrong way, after reconstructing it got AC.
But can you tell me why constructing the graph in the way I did (like problem stated regulators (nodes) and links have their own capacity and we calculate min flow by getting min(parent , link between u and parent ...
I'd constructed the graph in a wrong way, after reconstructing it got AC.
But can you tell me why constructing the graph in the way I did (like problem stated regulators (nodes) and links have their own capacity and we calculate min flow by getting min(parent , link between u and parent ...
- Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:23 pm
- Forum: Volume 103 (10300-10399)
- Topic: 10330 - Power Transmission
- Replies: 43
- Views: 21601
Re: 10330 - Power Transmission
Hi.
Can anyone tell me what is wrong with my code, please?
I've pass all test cases in the forum and got the correct answer, but still WA.
Thanks.
#include <cstdio>
#include <queue>
#include <cstring>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <climits>
using namespace std;
typedef long long ...
Can anyone tell me what is wrong with my code, please?
I've pass all test cases in the forum and got the correct answer, but still WA.
Thanks.
#include <cstdio>
#include <queue>
#include <cstring>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <climits>
using namespace std;
typedef long long ...
- Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:30 pm
- Forum: Volume 1 (100-199)
- Topic: 193 - Graph Coloring
- Replies: 93
- Views: 36456
Re: 193 Graph Coloring
@problemsolve I don't know why but I used dfs got WA then tried using backtracking and even though I thought I might get TLE got AC!:)
Can anyone explain why? Specially if you've solved it using BFS or DFS and got AC? Thanks.
Can anyone explain why? Specially if you've solved it using BFS or DFS and got AC? Thanks.
- Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:53 pm
- Forum: Volume 125 (12500-12599)
- Topic: 12543 - Longest Word
- Replies: 22
- Views: 7668
Re: 12543 - Longest Word
No, he wasn't in a hurry!!!raj wrote:thanks sir.......now its accepted........
but i think u was in hurry because.....
the read output should be according to your input...![]()
asdfasdfjkl

The correct output is what is written. Numbers like space in this problem are separators!
- Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:35 pm
- Forum: Volume 2 (200-299)
- Topic: 280 - Vertex
- Replies: 95
- Views: 37330
Re: 280 - Vertex
Never mind! I got it!!!
A teeny tiny, but in a way terribly big mistake!
A teeny tiny, but in a way terribly big mistake!
